R. T., & Hasher, L. (1988). Capacity theory and the processing of
inferences. In L. Light & D. Burke (Eds.), Language, Memory, and
Aging (pp. 154-170). New York: Cambridge University Press. [Book reprinted
in paperback, 1993]
Excerpt from the Chapter:
The study of adults age differences in comprehension of and memory for
text is an now burgeoning enterprise in cognitive gerontology, in part
because of the potential for direct application to the findings to everyday
life. To date, the work on discourse processing suggests the existence
of age deficits of varying magnitudes, deficits that are largely quantitative
rather than qualitative in nature. The work thus suggests that older adults
use the same processing mechanisms as younger adults but with poorer results
(e.g. Mandel & Johnson, 1984; Zelinski, Light, Gilewski, 1984).
Beyond this summary the literature yields few simple generalizations:
indeed, the findings on any given variable (e.g., education level) tend
to be complex and inconsistent. Consider the literature on the recall
of ideas that differ in their importance to the meaning structure of the
text. The usual finding with young adults (called the "levels effect")
is that the probability of recalling information from text is directly
related to the information's importance level in the text as defined by
a model (e.g., Kintsch's, 1974) of the hierarchical structure of that
text. When young and elderly adults have been compared, different experiments
have produced contradictory results. . . The most frequent findings are
(1) parallel levels effects for younger and older adults (e.g., Zelinski
et al., 1984); or (2) an exaggerated levels effect for the older adults,
with the greatest age deficit seen at low importance levels (e.g. Dixon,
Hultsch, Simon, & von Eye, 1984, for high verbal ability subjects;
Spilich, 1983). However, there is also an occasional finding of a diminished
levels effect for older adults with the greatest age deficit at high importance
levels (e.g., Dix et al., 1984, for low verbal ability subjects).
of this sort suggest the likelihood that additional variables are operating.
In the case of the levels effect, such variables as education, verbal
ability, and characteristics of the experimental texts (e.g., the familiarity
of the text structure and/or its content) might mediate the variable aging
trends (Dixon et al., 1984, Meyer& Rice, 1981). The suggestion that
such variable interact with age differences is consistent with Jenkin's
(1979) tetrahedral model of memory which argues that memory performance
in a particular situation is a joint function of the characteristics of
the subjects, of the materials they are required to remember, of the acquisition
conditions, and of the critical tasks.
We are sympathetic with the general goals of identifying and classifying
the multiple factors that control age difference in memory for text. However,
we believe that the pursuit of these goals will benefit from theoretical
analyses which indicated the specific characteristics of subjects, materials,
and tasks that might be functional in a particular situation. Thus, we
chose a different approach to the general problems of age differences
in discourse comprehension and memory.
The theoretical orientation guiding our research on discourse processing
derives from limited-capacity attention theory (Kahneman, 1973). We began
our research program with a general limited-capacity framework which made
few specific claims about either the nature of capacity constraints on
text processing or age differences. The initial framework and its associated
research led us to elaborate on our capacity model in such a way as to
increase the precision of our analysis of age differences in discourse
processing. In this paper we trace the development of our thinking by
reporting a line of research that at first seemed to support and then
to constrain the value of our initial general-capacity model. We also
outline our elaborated view on which future research will be based.
Back to Publications
| Lab Home | Research
Interests | General Lab Information
People in the Lab | Publications
| Photos | Related Sites
This website was designed by Riah
Flewelling & Mark Leung.
Copyright © 2001 Hasher Aging & Cognition Lab.
All rights reserved.