|
|
Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief Dr. J.B. Peterson Psychology 334S SS2110 1:00 - 4:00 Tuesday |
I will utter things that have been kept secret from the foundation of the world (Matthew 13:35)
ANNOUNCEMENTS: FEBRUARY 1: The due dates for all the assignments are finalized, here. The past authoring assignment will have to be done in the word version. The location for the word version is described here.
Apologies for the confusion. I thought that the advanced program would be ready, but it has been slightly delayed. It will be ready for the future authoring program, however.
| Percentage | Letter Grade | Grade Point Value | Grade Definition | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90-100 | A+ | 4.0 | Outstanding performance | |
| 85-89 | A | 4.0 | Exceptional performance | Strong evidence of original thinking; good organization; capacity to analyze and synthesize; superior grasp of subject matter with sound critical evaluations; evidence of extensive knowledge base. |
| 80-84 | A- | 3.7 | ||
| 77-79 | B+ | 3.3 | Good performance | Evidence of grasp of subject matter, some evidence of critical capacity and analytic ability; reasonable understanding of relevant issues; evidence of familiarity with literature |
| 73-76 | B | 3.0 | ||
| 70-72 | B- | 2.7 | ||
| 67-69 | C+ | 2.3 | Intellectually adequate performance | Student who is profiting from the university experience; understanding of the subject matter and ability to develop solutions to simple problems in the material. |
| 63-66 | C | 2.0 | ||
| 60-62 | C- | 1.7 | ||
| 57-59 | D+ | 1.3 | Minimally acceptable performance | Some evidence of familiarity with the subject matter and some evidence that critical and analytic skills have been developed. |
| 53-56 | D | 1.0 | ||
| 50-52 | D- | 0.7 | ||
| 0-49 | F | 0.0 | Inadequate performance | Little evidence of even superficial understanding of subject matter; weakness in critical and analytic skills; limited or irrelevant use of literature. |
Additional guidelines for reviewing can be found here.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
1. The textbook, Maps of Meaning, will be available in class for $50.
2. The first few chapters of Maps of Meaning are available online here:
Readings
Relevant Papers (and suggested completion dates)
Writing Assignments and Peer Review
Dr. Jordan B. Peterson (4046 Sidney Smith Hall)
![]()
Office Hours for JB Peterson: TBA
TA: Alex Guindon: email tba
Initial TA Office Hours: TBA
Course Home Page: http://psych.utoronto.ca/~peterson/ps10syll.htm
Home page: http://psych.utoronto.ca/~peterson/welcome.htm
back to Table of Contents
This course is based on the book Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief. Maps of Meaning lays bare the grammar of mythology, and describes the relevance of that grammar for interpretation of narrative and religion, comprehension of ideological identification, and understanding of the role that individual choice plays in the maintenance, transformation and destiny of social systems.
back to Table of Contents
READINGS
1. Primary Text
|
|
Peterson, J.B. (1999). Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief. New York: Routledge. This book is available in class for the Amazon.com purchase price of $50 CAD |
back to Table of Contents
2. Relevant Papers and Suggested Completion Dates
Action and its Imitation (January 12)
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L. & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews, 2, 661-670.
Memory, Novelty and Anxiety (January 26)
Vinogradova, O.S. (2001). Hippocampus as comparator. Hippocampus, 11, 578-598.
Ohman, A. & Mineka, S. (2003). The malicious serpent: snakes as a prototypical stimulus for an evolved module of fear. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 5-9.
Dominance and Hierarchy (February 02)
Kravitz, E.A. (2000). Serotonin and aggression: insights gained from a lobster model system and speculations on the role of amine neurons in a complex behavior. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 186, 221-238.
Higher Order Control (Feb 23)
Miller, E.K. (2001). The prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience Reviews 1, 59-65.
back to Table of Contents
|
Week |
Dates |
Chapter |
Pages |
# Pages |
Title..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... |
|||||||||
|
01 |
Jan 05 |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
02 |
Jan 12 |
Preface & 1-2 |
xi-32 |
43 |
|
|||||||||
|
03 |
Jan 19 |
2 |
32-89 |
57 |
|
|||||||||
|
04 |
Jan 26 |
2 |
89-148 |
59 |
|
|||||||||
| 05 | Feb 02 | 2 | 148-187 | 67 |
|
|||||||||
|
06 |
Feb 09 |
3 |
187-232 |
45 |
|
|||||||||
|
07 |
Feb 16 |
|
|
|
Reading Week |
|||||||||
|
08 |
Feb 23 |
4 |
233-283 |
50 |
|
|||||||||
|
09 |
Mar 02 |
4 |
283-306 |
23 |
|
|||||||||
|
10 |
Mar 09 |
5 |
307-342 |
35 |
|
|||||||||
|
11 |
Mar 16 |
5 |
342-368 |
26 |
|
|||||||||
|
12 |
Mar 23 |
5 |
368-400 |
32 |
|
|||||||||
|
13 |
Mar 30 |
5 |
400-469 |
69 |
|
back to Table of Contents
WRITING ASSIGNMENTS AND PEER REVIEW
You will be required to produce three written assignments, and to peer review written work for three students over the duration of the course. Two of the writing assignments (1 and 3) are available online. The other one (2) may be an essay or narrative (including poetry).
Peer Review: Before an author or researcher publishes a paper or a book, he or she has generally received feedback from several anonymous peer reviewers and an editor and rewritten the work with those criticisms in mind. This process may be repeated three or four times, and generally results in a much stronger finished product. Your written work for this class will thus be read by three anonymous students, criticized constructively, and graded. You will receive the average of the top two grades that you were awarded for each assignment. Instructions for Peer Review can be found here.
Essay or Narrative Writing: Hints for essay or narrative writing can be found here.
Past Authoring is an exercise designed to help you understand your personal history more clearly. Every experience that you have had contains information. If you have fully processed the information in that experience, (1) its recollection will no longer produce negative emotion and (2) you have learned everything you need to know from it, at least for now. Any past experience more than a year old (approximately) that still produces negative emotion still has information embedded in it. Writing about such experiences helps extract that information. Writing helps move the information from vague, emotion-laden and imagistic representation to high resolution conscious narrative form.
The assignment can be found online here. Some explanatory material can be found here.
Save the document EXACTLY as YOURSTUDENTNUMBERASSIGNMENTNUMBER.doc. Please post it at the Blackboard Maps of Meaning site (login at http://portal.utoronto.ca/)
back to Table of Contents
Assignment 2, Essay or Narrative Writing: 2000 words
The essay is on a topic of your choice.
Assignment 2 is designed to give students maximal freedom of expression. You may write a formal scientific essay, a philosophical essay, a story or a poem.
If you choose to write a short story or a poem (or anything else of a literary nature) make sure you include an interpretive afterword, detailing the relationship between that story or poem and the class material. This means that you have to serve as your own literary critic.
The paper should have an appropriate and sufficiently ambitious goal.
The paper should be explicitly related to the themes of the class.
The paper should incorporate material beyond that which is covered in lecture and in the text, Maps of Meaning, even if that additional material is simply your own thought.
The paper should employ an appropriate form for the achievement of its goal. The form should be well executed.
Writing should display (in approximate order of importance): clarity, coherence, style, economy, grammar, punctuation. Most papers should include both analysis and synthesis.
The goal should be successfully achieved.
NOTE: Assignment 2 should be 2000 words long, double-spaced, in type no smaller than 12-point.
When you have completed Assignment 2, save it EXACTLY as YOURSTUDENTNUMBER2.doc. We will tell you where to post it in the next two weeks.
back to Table of Contents
Assignment 3, Future Authoring
Future Authoring is an exercise designed to help you lay out a set of explicit goals for your future. In essence, you will be asked to write your own story. Carl Jung once noted that every person lives a story, or a myth. This means (1) that you know your own story, and are acting it out consciously, (2) that you do not know your own story, and may therefore be unconsciously or implicitly acting out a tragedy, or (3) because of your own lack of direction, you serve as a minor character – and, perhaps, a foolish or tragic one – in the stories of other people. Obviously, option (1) is preferable to (2) or (3), but it also requires some conscious effort. The Future Authoring Exercise has been designed to aid that effort.
Save the document EXACTLY as YOURSTUDENTNUMBERASSIGNMENTNUMBER.doc. Please post it at the Blackboard Maps of Meaning site (login at http://portal.utoronto.ca/)
back to Table of Contents
| Week | Date | Assignment | Grade |
| 06 | Feb 15 | 1. Past Authoring | 20% |
| 08 | Feb 24 |
|
5% |
| 09 | Mar 03 | 2. Essay or Narrative | 20% |
| 10 | Mar 10 |
|
|
| 12 | March 24 | 3. Future Authoring | 20% |
| 14 | April 07 |
|
5% |
| Exam Period | TBA | 4. Final Exam | 30% |
back to Table of Contents
This document has been requested times since January 07, 2007.
back to Table of Contents
J.B. Peterson's home page.